Skip to content

Where Do You Eat?

A negative comment in response to Ryan’s post about the Farmers Diner coming to Middlebury prompted me to check out the Vermont Department of Health Food and Lodging Program Inspection Report. Restaurants undergo a 44-item inspection. Of the 44, 31 items measure non-critical aspects of a restaurant, such as construction (flooring, plumbing, etc.) and overall cleanliness (proper garbage containers, clean bathrooms, etc.) However, 13 items are critical, meaning “there is a high likelihood of illness if left uncorrected.” Restaurants can score a maximum of 100 points; scores of 70 are lower mean a restaurant will be asked to close until its violations can be addressed.

Although I was on a quest to see how Middlebury-area restaurants fare health-wise, I discovered Middlebury College’s dining halls and other food establishments have also been inspected by the VT DoH. Below is a summary of the reports:

51 Main Street: 95/100 points on 3/28/2008 – lost points on 4 non-critical items.

Freeman International Center: 90/100 points on 1/16/2008 – lost 5 points on 4 non-critical items; lost 5 points on 1 critical item: Necessary toxic items must be properly stored, separated, labeled, and used.

The Grille: 87/100 points on 1/16/2008 – lost 8 points on 6 non-critical items; lost 5 points on 1 critical item: Potentially hazardous food meets time and temperature requirements during storage, preparation, display, service and transportation.

Kirk Alumni Center Dining: 94/100 on 6/5/2008 – lost 2 points on 2 non-critical items; lost 4 points on 1 critical item: Adequate, convenient and properly maintained toilet facilities are available.

Atwater Dining Hall: 87/100 on 1/16/2008 – lost 3 points on 2 non-critical items; lost 10 points on 2 critical items: Potentially hazardous food meets time and temperature requirements during storage, preparation, display, service and transportation. Personnel must wash hands and use good hygienic practices, be free of jewelry and have nails trimmed.

Proctor Dining Hall: 87/100 on 1/16/2008 – lost 8 points on 5 non-critical items; lost 5 points on 1 critical item: Necessary toxic items must be properly stored, separated, labeled, and used.

Ross Dining Hall: 87/100 on 1/16/2008 – lost 8 points on 5 non-critical items; lost 5 points on 1 critical item: Necessary toxic items must be properly stored, separated, labeled, and used.

Although all of Middlebury’s dining halls and other food establishments have a few improvements to make, I think Middlebury students can rest assured that they–and especially their food–are in good hands. It is important to note that many of Middlebury’s food inspections occurred approximately one year ago; I am confident that Matthew Biette and our dining hall employees have worked hard to correct the problems. Moreover, Middlebury dining halls tend to fare better than other popular Midd Kid hotspots like the China House (76), Mr. Ups (75), Steve’s Park Diner (85), and Taste of India (84).

MiddBlog will keep an eye out for the upcoming DoH inspections and will report on all of Middlebury’s improvements.

2 Comments
  1. Scores are only as good as the inspector/ state employee checking into the establishment. I have found that many of these employees are incompetent at best. Do they have an ax to grind? Do they feel like they must write up some form of error/violation to justify their existence???

    January 3, 2009
  2. Health inspector — dunno.
    Liquor inspector — I think Middkids have a better…relationship…with that inspector.

    January 3, 2009

Comments are closed.